There is a section of aggressive minority-ism bogeymen who appear every now and then to expose their farcical "liberalism" that is another word for gross anti-Hinduism in India. These liberal retards think they own the nation and can override anything that the nation holds sacred, that the founding fathers of the constitution put in as a directive principle, that the Supreme Court has upheld, that even the Mughals and British Colonialists had respected and that majority of the states in India have ratified.
Traditionally cows are considered sacred in Hindu India. Hinduism is based on the concept of omnipresence of the Divine, and the presence of a soul in all creations including bovine.The concept of slaughtering cows among the militant minorities and useful liberal idiots from the hindu community arose from the historical invasions of Islamists who enforced dhimmitude and humiliation on the vanquished Hindu subjects. For example, In 1756–57, in what was his fourth invasion of India, the founder of the Durrani Empire, Ahmad Shāh Durrānī sacked Delhi and plundered Agra, Mathura, and Vrndavana. On his way back to Afghanistan, he attacked the Golden Temple in Amritsar and filled its sacred pool with the blood of slaughtered cows. These are the kind of traditions our Liberals retards seek to uphold.
In independent India there was a committed intent to protect cows.
The "Preservation, protection and improvement of stock and prevention of animal diseases, veterinary training and practice" is Entry 15 of the State List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Presently 24 out of 29 states in India currently have various regulations prohibiting either the slaughter or sale of cows.
Prohibition of cow slaughter is a Directive Principles of State Policy contained in Article 48 of the Constitution.Almost 95% of the slaughter houses in India are illegal, purportedly serving to the illegal demands of the liberal community that can go to any lengths to satiate their illegitimate and illegal quirks.
On October 26,2005 the Supreme Court of India , in a landmark judgement upheld the constitutional validity of anti-cow slaughter laws enacted by different state governments in India.
History
It is said that the CHola King Manu Needhi Cholan killed his own son to provide justice to a cow. The ancient sculptures of Indus valley civilizations and the continued worship of Nandi proves the eminent place of bovines in traditional Indian society.
In medieval times, The Mughal emperor Babar ruled in 1526 that killing cows was forbidden. In his Wasiyyat namd-i-majchfi (Persian: secret testament) to his son and successor, Humayun, dated First Jamadi-ul-Awwal 935 Hijri (11 January 1529), babur instructed that hearts of people of Hindustan can be won by keeping bigotry aside (implying that Hindu community wishes should be respected). This restriction on cow slaughter continued until Ahmad Shah's rule in 1754, although there was a reversal in 1645 under the reign of ultra-Islamist Aurangzeb, who revived cruel subjugation of dharmic communities. He imposed cow slaughter to humiliate the Hindu subjects, as mentioned in 9th Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur's memoirs. However, after Aurangzeb, the resurgent Maratha and Sikh empires banned cow slaughter again.
Even while the British, who were habitual beef eaters forced slaughter, the rebellion of 1857 against the British East India Company, led by both Hindus and Muslim sepoys was based on the reverence of the cow. Every social movement like Arya Samaj also stressed on cow protection.
In the late 1800s, Some incidents precipitated by the British led to Hindu-Muslim riots in Mumbai, Rangoon, Azamgarh, etc on the issue of cow slaughter. In the backdrop of violent riots, Queen Victoria mentioned the cow protection movement in a letter, dated 8 December 1893, to then Viceroy Lansdowne, writing, "The Queen greatly admired the Viceroy's speech on the Cow-killing agitation. While she quite agrees in the necessity of perfect fairness, she thinks the Muhammadans do require more protection than Hindus, and they are decidedly by far the more loyal. Though the Muhammadan's cow-killing is made the pretext for the agitation, it is, in fact, directed against us, who kill far more cows for our army, &c., than the Muhammadans." It is since then that the protection of beef-eating people crept into Indian Governance, in spite of most great freedom fighters of the time actively participating in cow-protection movements. It became a fight between the elite and the masses since then.
Post-Independence Congress-led governments, who were but an extension of the colonial Raj, continued with the encouragement of cow-slaughter in the name of scientific temperament and rationalism. It also went so far as to release grants and loans for setting up of modern slaughter houses, which the Hindu Nationalists call the Pink Revolution.
Jayaprakash Narayan in his letter to then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi calling for a ban on cow slaughter, Narayan wrote, "For myself, I cannot understand why, in a Hindu majority country like India, where rightly or wrongly, there is such a strong feeling about cow-slaughter, there cannot be a legal ban"
The opposition to cow-slaughter in India therefore has variously been motivated by Anti-Hinduism, Jehad, Elitism, Subjugation, or Colonialism. It is unfortunate our liberals mock the tradition of the majority population of their own nation to prove themselves as true inheritors of the worst sort of Invaders and British the country has seen.
Traditionally cows are considered sacred in Hindu India. Hinduism is based on the concept of omnipresence of the Divine, and the presence of a soul in all creations including bovine.The concept of slaughtering cows among the militant minorities and useful liberal idiots from the hindu community arose from the historical invasions of Islamists who enforced dhimmitude and humiliation on the vanquished Hindu subjects. For example, In 1756–57, in what was his fourth invasion of India, the founder of the Durrani Empire, Ahmad Shāh Durrānī sacked Delhi and plundered Agra, Mathura, and Vrndavana. On his way back to Afghanistan, he attacked the Golden Temple in Amritsar and filled its sacred pool with the blood of slaughtered cows. These are the kind of traditions our Liberals retards seek to uphold.
In independent India there was a committed intent to protect cows.
The "Preservation, protection and improvement of stock and prevention of animal diseases, veterinary training and practice" is Entry 15 of the State List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Presently 24 out of 29 states in India currently have various regulations prohibiting either the slaughter or sale of cows.
Prohibition of cow slaughter is a Directive Principles of State Policy contained in Article 48 of the Constitution.Almost 95% of the slaughter houses in India are illegal, purportedly serving to the illegal demands of the liberal community that can go to any lengths to satiate their illegitimate and illegal quirks.
On October 26,2005 the Supreme Court of India , in a landmark judgement upheld the constitutional validity of anti-cow slaughter laws enacted by different state governments in India.
History
It is said that the CHola King Manu Needhi Cholan killed his own son to provide justice to a cow. The ancient sculptures of Indus valley civilizations and the continued worship of Nandi proves the eminent place of bovines in traditional Indian society.
In medieval times, The Mughal emperor Babar ruled in 1526 that killing cows was forbidden. In his Wasiyyat namd-i-majchfi (Persian: secret testament) to his son and successor, Humayun, dated First Jamadi-ul-Awwal 935 Hijri (11 January 1529), babur instructed that hearts of people of Hindustan can be won by keeping bigotry aside (implying that Hindu community wishes should be respected). This restriction on cow slaughter continued until Ahmad Shah's rule in 1754, although there was a reversal in 1645 under the reign of ultra-Islamist Aurangzeb, who revived cruel subjugation of dharmic communities. He imposed cow slaughter to humiliate the Hindu subjects, as mentioned in 9th Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur's memoirs. However, after Aurangzeb, the resurgent Maratha and Sikh empires banned cow slaughter again.
Even while the British, who were habitual beef eaters forced slaughter, the rebellion of 1857 against the British East India Company, led by both Hindus and Muslim sepoys was based on the reverence of the cow. Every social movement like Arya Samaj also stressed on cow protection.
In the late 1800s, Some incidents precipitated by the British led to Hindu-Muslim riots in Mumbai, Rangoon, Azamgarh, etc on the issue of cow slaughter. In the backdrop of violent riots, Queen Victoria mentioned the cow protection movement in a letter, dated 8 December 1893, to then Viceroy Lansdowne, writing, "The Queen greatly admired the Viceroy's speech on the Cow-killing agitation. While she quite agrees in the necessity of perfect fairness, she thinks the Muhammadans do require more protection than Hindus, and they are decidedly by far the more loyal. Though the Muhammadan's cow-killing is made the pretext for the agitation, it is, in fact, directed against us, who kill far more cows for our army, &c., than the Muhammadans." It is since then that the protection of beef-eating people crept into Indian Governance, in spite of most great freedom fighters of the time actively participating in cow-protection movements. It became a fight between the elite and the masses since then.
Post-Independence Congress-led governments, who were but an extension of the colonial Raj, continued with the encouragement of cow-slaughter in the name of scientific temperament and rationalism. It also went so far as to release grants and loans for setting up of modern slaughter houses, which the Hindu Nationalists call the Pink Revolution.
Jayaprakash Narayan in his letter to then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi calling for a ban on cow slaughter, Narayan wrote, "For myself, I cannot understand why, in a Hindu majority country like India, where rightly or wrongly, there is such a strong feeling about cow-slaughter, there cannot be a legal ban"
The opposition to cow-slaughter in India therefore has variously been motivated by Anti-Hinduism, Jehad, Elitism, Subjugation, or Colonialism. It is unfortunate our liberals mock the tradition of the majority population of their own nation to prove themselves as true inheritors of the worst sort of Invaders and British the country has seen.
